Industrial designs in the era of change – revolution, evolution or stagnation?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2024.08.01.01Słowa kluczowe:
design, multiple application, harmonization and unification of design lawAbstrakt
The article analyzes the amendments in Polish and European design law that have been just proposed by EU and Polish legislator. The registration proceedings of EU designs held before the EUIPO differs from the registration of designs proceeded by the Polish Patent Office (and by other national patent offices too). Due to the different scope of protection of Community designs and national designs the EU legislator wanted to introduce the harmonization within the procedural rules too. Polish legislator wants to change design law too. Consequently, EU legislator and Polish legislator have just proposed some amendments in design law. This study presents only examples proposed by EU and Polish legislator. They could be treated as revolution, evolution or stagnation. The basic research method for this article was analysis of EU and Polish design law (that is in force and proposed by EU and Polish legislator) and Polish and European practice of design law.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Nowińska, E., Promińska, U., & duVall, M. (2007). Prawo własności przemysłowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis.
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of designs (recast) (proposal of 28/11/2022 COM( 2022) 667 final 2022/0392 (COD).
Report on an intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience, as adopted by the Legal Affairs Committee on 30 September 2021 (A9-0284/2021).
Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, J. (2016). Wymogi dotyczące zgłoszenia wzoru wspólnotowego do rejestracji. In M. Poźniak-Niedzielska & J. Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, Europejskie prawo wzorów przemysłowych (pp. 62-63). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Szczepanowska-Kozłowska, K. (2010). Pojęcie wzoru przemysłowego – między funkcjonalnością a estetyką. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego 14(3), 10-16.
Szewc, A., & Niewęgłowski, A. (2017). In R. Skubisz (Ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Prawo własności przemysłowej (vol. 14B). Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Tischner, A. (2020). In P. Kostański (Ed.), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
