Sharing Practice in an International Context – a Critique of the Benefits of International Exchanges for Trainee Teachers

Authors

  • Emma Whewell University of Northampton, United Kingdom
  • Anna Cox University of Northampton, United Kingdom
  • Kerstin Theinert Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2020.04.01.02

Keywords:

teacher education, professional development, international exchange, intercultural competence

Abstract

This reflective article is based on the experiences of two years of teacher training students from the University of Northampton and the Pedagogical University of Weingarten. This article looks more closely at the benefits that international exchange experiences have afforded the trainee teachers involved and how challenges to the process have been addressed. This reflection reveals the value of international exchanges in challenging perceptions and assumptions and how the thinking of the trainee teachers changed following the exchange. This study employs a qualitative approach drawing upon the reflections and experiences of the participants through written and spoken data. The findings reveal trainee teachers developed skills specific to teaching and in particular teaching languages, and they also demonstrated an increased awareness of non teaching specific skills such as problem solving and intercultural sensitivity. The reflections offer insight into how trainee teachers, use, interpret and subsequently act upon the experiences offered in an international exchange.

Author Biographies

Emma Whewell, University of Northampton, United Kingdom

Dr, Senior Lecturer in Physical Education, University of Northampton

Anna Cox, University of Northampton, United Kingdom

Dr, Senior Lecturer in Teachers Continuing Professional Development

Kerstin Theinert, Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten, Germany

Dr. phil., Universtiy of Education Weingarten, Akademische Oberrätin, Fak.II, Fachbereich Englisch, Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten

References

Atieno, P. (2009.) An analysis of the strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, 13-18.

Barkhuizen, G., & Feryok, A. (2006). Pre -Service Teachers’ Perceptions of a Short -Term International Experience Programme. Asia -Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660500479904.

Bennett, S., Brown, J.Jr., Kirby -Smith, A., & Severson, B. (2013). Influences of the heart: novice and experienced teachers remaining in the field. Teacher Development, 17(4), 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.849613.

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2015). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation for human and social scientists]. Heidelberg: Springer.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research Methods in Education. Routledge, Oxon.

Creswell, J.W. (2003.) Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.

Cruickshank, K., & Westbrook, R. (2013.) Local and global – conflicting perspectives? The place of overseas practicum in preservice teacher education. Asia -Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 55–68.

Department for Education. (2011). Teacher Standards: Guidance for School Leaders, School Staff and Governing Bodies. Retreived from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/665520/Teachers__Standards.pdf.

Department for Education. (2014). Promoting fundamental British values as part of SMSC in schools Departmental advice for maintained schools. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380595/SMSC_Guidance_Maintained_Schools.pdf.

Department for Education. (2017). Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2017. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/schools-pupils-and-their-characteristics-january-2017.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case -Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077800405284363.

Fung King Lee, J. (2011). International Field Experience – What do student teachers learn?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(10), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n10.4.

Gibbs, G. (2011). The Sage qualitative research kit. Los Angeles: Sage.

Henry, A., Casserly, A., Coady, M., & Marshall, H. (2008). A phenomenological case study exploring different perspectives on inclusion within one post -primary school in north west Ireland. Sligo, Ireland: St. Angela’s College and NUI Galway. Retreived from http://www.stangelas.com/Downloads/Departments/Education/SEN/Phenomenological%20Case%20Study.pdf.

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–4. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26.

Leutwyler, B., & Meierhans, C. (2016). Effects of international student exchange on pre -service teachers: a quasi -experimental study. Intercultural Education, 27(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1144713.

Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlage und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: basis and techniques]. Weinheim: Beltz.

Mayring, P., & Gläser -Zikuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). Die Praxis der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz.

Mills, C. (2008). Making a difference. Moving beyond the superficial treatment of diversity. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4). 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802375925.

Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport Baden -Württemberg. (2016a). Lehrkräftebegleitheft zum Bildungsplan 2016 [Teacher Support Booklet on the Education Plan ]. Villingen -Schwenningen: Neckar -Verlag GmbH.

Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport Baden -Württemberg. (2016b). Bildungsplan der Grundschule [Primary School Education Plan]. Villingen -Schwenningen: Neckar -Verlag GmbH.

Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport Baden -Württemberg. (2016c). Bildungsplan der Sekundarstufe I [Upper Secondary Education Plan I]. Villingen -Schwenningen: Neckar -Verlag GmbH.

Noor, K.B.M. (2008). Case Study: A Strategic Research Method. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602–1604. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.1602.1604.

Pietkiewicz, I. & Smith, J. (2014). A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14.

Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden (Eds.) (2016). Schulen auf einen Blick [Schools at a Glance]. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Schulen/Publikationen/Downloads-Schulen/broschuere-schulen-blick-0110018169004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.

Uusimaki, L., & Swirski, T. (2016). Cross -cultural “distance”, “friction” and “flow”: exploring the experiences of pre -service teachers on international practicum. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2014.961897.

Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning -Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

Walters, L.M., Garii, B., & Walters, T. (2009). Learning globally, teaching locally: incorporating international exchange and intercultural learning into pre -service teacher training. Intercultural Education, 20(sup1), S151 -S158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980903371050.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Whewell, E., Cox, A., & Theinert, K. (2020). Sharing Practice in an International Context – a Critique of the Benefits of International Exchanges for Trainee Teachers. Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 4(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2020.04.01.02