Crypto-asset Market Regulation and Sustainable Development Goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2024.08.02.04Keywords:
cryptocurrency, crypto-assets, blockchain, sustainability, bitcoin, MiCAAbstract
The literature has long pointed out the energy consumption of blockchain technology, including in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals. The paper includes, with this aspect in mind, an analysis of existing and proposed crypto-asset regulations, in particular the draft MiCA regulation. This analysis was conducted to answer the research question of how current and proposed regulations on crypto-assets address the issue of energy consumption by blockchain networks. However, the analysis of these regulations should not be limited only to the impact of blockchain technology on electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 13) but also consider other aspects of the crypto-asset impact, i.e. its effect on the implementation of Sustainable Development Goals 8, 8.1., 8.2, 9.3, 8.10, 10.5., 10c. Therefore, it is necessary to ask the research question whether crypto-asset regulations, both in force and those proposed, take these goals into account and are conducive to their realization. The research used the dogmatic-legal method based on analysis of draft and existing legislation, and took into account the literature on the subject. The study found that the analyzed crypto-asset regulations of some European countries, Japan and a number of US states, as well as the draft MiCA regulation as of October 2022 and draft federal regulations in the US, do not address the problem of regulating the energy consumption of blockchain networks used for issuing and trading crypto-assets and thus do not directly affect the reduction of electricity consumption by these networks and thus the reduction of greenhouse gases. On the other hand, they are undoubtedly relevant to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 8.1., 8.2, 9.3, 8.10, 10.5., 10c. In addition, legal regulation of crypto-assets facilitates blockchain systems that enable more efficient management of energy distribution, particularly green energy, which contributes to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 13. It follows that despite the lack of provisions aimed directly at reducing the energy consumption of crypto-asset emissions and trading in the existing and proposed crypto-asset regulations analyzed, these regulations contribute positively to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. This does not mean, however, that the idea of reducing the energy consumption of blockchain networks through legal regulation, particularly for private networks, should be abandoned – rather, such targeted regulation should be contained within energy law.
Downloads
References
Arciniegas, J., & Conner, W. T. (2022). The Digital Asset Regulatory Landscape Begins to Take Shape: The Responsible Financial Innovation Act. The Investment Lawyer. Covering Legal and Regulatory Issues of Asset Management, 29(10), https://intelliconnect.cch.com/docmedia/attach/WKUS-TAL-DOCS-PHC/46/IIVL_IL_1022.pdf.
Bala S., Kopyściański T., Srokosz W. (2016). Cryptocurrencies as electronic means of payment with-out the issuer : computer science, economic, and legal aspects. Wrocław. https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/1234.
Barceló, E., Dimić-Mišić, K., Imani, M., Spasojević Brkić, V., Hummel, M., & Gane, P. (2023). Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids. Sustainability, 15(3), 2571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032571.
Dewery, J. N. (2023). Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Regulation 2023. Global Legal Group. https://www.skadden.com/-/media/files/publications/2023/01/legal_considerations_in_the_minting_marketing_and_selling_of_nfts.pdf.
Dindar, B., & Gül, Ö. (2022). The detection of illicit cryptocurrency mining farms with innovative approaches for the prevention of electricity theft. Energy & Environment, 33(8), 1663–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211045066.
Fadeyi, O., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., Kuca, K., Brida, P., & Selamat, A. (2019). Opinions on Sustainability of Smart Cities in the Context of Energy Challenges Posed by Cryptocurrency Mining. Sustainability, 12(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010169.
Haynes, A., & Yeoh, P. (2020). Cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets: Regulatory and legal issues. Informa Law from Routledge.
Huynh, A. N. Q., Duong, D., Burggraf, T., Luong, H. T. T., & Bui, N. H. (2022). Energy Consumption and Bitcoin Market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-021-09338-4.
Jiang, S., Li, Y., Lu, Q., Hong, Y., Guan, D., Xiong, Y., & Wang, S. (2021). Policy assessments for the carbon emission flows and sustainability of Bitcoin blockchain operation in China. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1938. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3.
Jones, B. A., Goodkind, A. L., & Berrens, R. P. (2022). Economic estimation of Bitcoin mining’s climate damages demonstrates closer resemblance to digital crude than digital gold. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18686-8.
Khezami, N., Gharbi, N., Neji, B., & Braiek, N. B. (2022). Blockchain Technology Implementation in the Energy Sector: Comprehensive Literature Review and Mapping. Sustainability, 14(23), 15826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315826.
Lee, J. Y. (2019). A decentralized token economy: How blockchain and cryptocurrency can revolutionize business. Business Horizons, 62(6), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.003.
Náñez Alonso, S. L., Jorge-Vázquez, J., Echarte Fernández, M. Á., & Reier Forradellas, R. F. (2021). Cryptocurrency Mining from an Economic and Environmental Perspective. Analysis of the Most and Least Sustainable Countries. Energies, 14(14), 4254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144254.
Parmentola, A., Petrillo, A., Tutore, I., & De Felice, F. (2022). Is blockchain able to enhance environmental sustainability? A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2882.
Sang, X., Leng, X., Xue, L., & Ran, X. (2022). Based on the Time-Spatial Power-Based Cryptocurrency Miner Driving Force Model, Establish a Global CO2 Emission Prediction Framework after China Bans Cryptocurrency. Sustainability, 14(9), 5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095332.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Witold Srokosz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
