The public interest perspective in the medical grounds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2023.07.01.03Keywords:
law, funds, medical, international, rightsAbstract
The goals include the obtained results from the advisable sources, specifically as a sense of the carried-out analysis. So it is a conceivable objective that the legal national interest perspective should be explicit pursuant to the doctrine. The patient has a number of rights not cataloged numerus clausus. However, how has legislation changed in the face of the pandemic and European Union budgetary law? Did it have an impact on strengthening the law and increasing the focus on the patient? In such difficult times of a pandemic, it was necessary, therefore, to adapt more to technological and legal developments. The restrictions that resulted from the pandemic, however, were intended not to infringe on patients' acquired and absolute human rights. It is an important dogmatic and historical method in the sense that this is a work with a historical dimension because it is describing the most important events in the history of the globe for human rights and medical law, which are trying to combine. In conclusion, it is important to share knowledge in the field of medical law that is popularized in the field of documents considered medical, which has been discussed more in the text. It aims to indicate where an individual would assert the rights if not through the proliferation of specialized human rights courts. What is more significant, the representation of states is related to their international competencies, which may, in the future, ensure membership of other international organizations, in order to focus the role of a global coordinator of similar problems in the European sphere. It is the choice of countries to belong to international specialized organizations that make it easier to shape mechanisms for the protection of medical rights.
Downloads
References
Barcik, J. (2013). Międzynarodowe prawo zdrowia publicznego. C.H. Beck.
Barczak-Oplustil, A., & Sroka, T. (2022). Odpowiedzialność publicznoprawna. System Prawa Medycznego. Tom 6. C.H. Beck.
Bosek, L. (2022). Stan epidemii. Konstrukcja prawna. C.H.Beck.
Dzehtsiarou, K. (2015). European consensus and the legitimacy of the European court of human rights. Cambridge University Press.
Górski, A. (2019). O prawie medycznym i pojęciach o proweniencji medycznej w systemie prawa. Forum prawnicze 3.
Gruskin, S., Mills, E. J., & Tarantola, D. (2013). Health and Human Rights in a Changing World. Routledge.
Hoffman, I., & Kostrubiec, J. (2022). Political Freedoms and Rights in Relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland and Hungary in a Comparative Legal Perspective. Bialystok Legal Studies, 27(2), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.02.02.
Hungary, Governmental Decree no. 40/2020 on declaring state of danger (40/2020.), 11 March 2020, available at the Hungarian legal sources page: https://njt.hu/translated/doc/J2020R0040K_20200326_FIN.pdf.
Judgment 26.10.2000 [GC] Kudła v. Poland [GC] - 30210/96 Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 23 October 2000.
Judgment ECHR, Kiss v. Hungary from 20.05.2010.
Judgment Fehér v. Hungary (Application no. 69095/10), Final Judgment 02/10/2013.
Judgment of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland (Application no. 45036/98), Judgment Strasbourg 30 June 2005.
Judgment of the Court in 1969. - E. Stauder v City of Ulm.
Judgment of the Court of 7 January 2004. K.B. v National Health Service Pensions Agency and Secretary of State for Health.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights from 31.7.2001 r., Refah Partisi i in. v. Turkey, Nr 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98, 41344/98.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights from 4.12.2003 r., Gündüz v. Turkey, Nr 35071/97.
Judgment Winterwerp v. The Netherlands from 24.10.1979 of the European Court of Human Rights.
Judgments Eur. Court H.R. of 11 July 2002 in Goodwin v United Kingdom and I. v United Kingdom.
Kondak, I. S. (2011). Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka. In L. Garlicki (Ed.), Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności Tom II, Komentarz do artykułów 19-59 oraz Protokołów dodatkowych. Warszawa.
Kubiak, R. Prawo medyczne, 4. ed. C.H. Beck 2021.
Nesterowicz, M. (2017). Prawo medyczne Komentarze i glosy do orzeczeń sądowych. Warszawa.
Nys, H. (2021). European Union Health Law. Wolters Kluwer.
Olszewski, R., & Małolepszy, A. (2022). Exercise of the right to defence in criminal proceedings during the COVID-19 pandemic with particular reference to the relation between the accused and the defence counsel. Bialystok Legal Studies, 27(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2022.27.02.13.
Polish Constitution, https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/konstytucja-rzeczypospolitej-polskiej-16798613/art-68.
Regulation (EU) 2021/522 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 establishing a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (‘EU4Health Programme’) for the period 2021-2027, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 (Text with EEA relevance), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2021.107.01.0001.01.ENG.
Sitarz, O., & Sitarz, M. (2022). Cyfrowe wspomaganie decyzji medycznych w świetle prawa karnego. Przegląd Prawa Medycznego, 3(3-4).
Sozański, J. (2012). Ogólne zasady prawa a wartości Unii Europejskiej: po traktacie lizbońskim - studium prawnoporównawcze. Toruń.
Szeroczyńska, M. (2013). Withdrawing and withholding futile therapy - de lege lata and de lege ferenda. Medycyna Paliatywna/Palliative Medicine, 5(2), 31–40.
Varju, M. (2020). Member State Interests and European Union Law Revisiting the Foundations of Member State Obligations. London and New York.
Wrońska, I. (2011). Fundamental Rights protection in the Council of Europe: The role of the European Court of Human Rights. Białystok.
Wrześniewska-Wal, I. (2020). Dochodzenie roszczeń w sprawach o błąd medyczny – uwagi de lege lata i de lege ferenda. Studia Prawnoustrojowe 48.
Zajdel-Całkowska, J. &, Zimna, T. (2021). Prawo medyczne w ochronie zdrowia. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Zielińska, E. (Ed.) (2014). Ustawa o zawodach lekarza i lekarza dentysty. Komentarz. Warszawa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anna Duma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
