Recovery of unpaid funding by beneficiaries of EU funds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2023.07.01.01Keywords:
irregularity, damage, claim for co-financing, reimbursement of fundsAbstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the issue of pursuing claims for payment by beneficiaries of EU funds. The author analyzed the jurisprudence of Polish courts in cases concerning EU funds, as well as literature devoted to these issues. Based on the article, the issue of legal bases of beneficiaries' claims related to the refusal to pay EU funds on the basis of co-financing agreements is analyzed. Attention was drawn to the important role of compensation and payment proceedings as legal instruments enabling the fulfilment of the Member State's tasks in the prevention of irregularities. The issue of the possibility of treating unpaid funding as damage in the sense of lost profits was also analyzed. The article discusses the grounds of causation between the improper operation of the institution refusing to pay the subsidy and the damage suffered by the beneficiaries. Beneficiaries on the basis of a co-financing agreement may pursue both claims for payment, i.e. for performance of the service, as well as claims for damages. Claims for damages require proof of damage and a causal link between the unlawful act of the institution and the damage. Damage may also be an amount equivalent to the value of the grant that the beneficiary would have obtained if it had not been for the improper performance of the contract by the institution.
Downloads
References
Act of 23.04.1964 - Civil Code, i.e. Journal of Laws 2022.1360.
Act of 7 September 1991 on the education system, i.e. Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1327, as amended.
Act on public finances of 27.09.2009, i.e. Journal of Laws of 2022, item 1634.
Borys, A. (2019). Hypothetical causation. The issue of determining the scope of tort liability in the event of the occurrence of the so-called reserve cause (causa superveniens). Student Legal, Administrative and Economic Works 28, 33-138.
Brysiewicz, K., & Poździk, R. (2011). Judicial proceedings in cases related to co-financing projects from structural and cohesion funds. Przegląd Sądowy 4, 36-52.
Czub, K. (2022). Article 361. In M. Balwicka-Szczyrba & A. Sylwestrzak (Eds.), Civil Code. Comment. SIP Lex.
Fuchs, B. (2018). Article 361. In M. Fras & M. Habdas M. (Eds.), Civil Code. Comment. Volume III. Commitments. General part (Articles 353-534). Warsaw.
Jankowska, A. (2009). [No title]. In T. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund. Warsaw.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 15.01.2021, I ACa 335/20.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 17.01.2018, I ACa 704/17.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 23.05.2018, I ACa 83/18.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 30.05.2014, I ACa 104/14.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Gdańsk of 22.10.2014, V ACa 850/13.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Krakow of 28.11.2018, I ACa 210/18.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Krakow of 4.07.2019, I ACa 804/18.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznań of 13.11.2012, ref. I ACa 801/12.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Szczecin of 18.10.2019, I ACa 305/19.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Szczecin of 26.6.2013, ref. I ACa 190/13.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Szczecin of 31.03.2021, I ACa 426/20.
judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 17.10.2014, VI ACa 1932/13.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 20.06.2017, I ACa 544/17.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 22.02.2019, VII AGa 1092/18.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 24.03.2017, I ACa 2403/15.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 24.10.2012, VI ACa 568/12.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 28.02.2019, VI ACa 888/18.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 30.12.2021, V ACa 428/20.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 9.04.2019, VI ACa 129/19.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 9.10.2013, VI A Ca 1444/12.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 9.10.2013, VI ACa 1444/12.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw, of 24.10.2013, VI ACa 281/13.
Judgment of the District Court in Łódź of 10.3.2014, II C 88/13.
Judgment of the District Court in Łódź of 29.08.2018, II C 114/15.
Judgment of the District Court in Łódź of 29.08.2018, II C 114/15.
Judgment of the Regional Court in Poznań of 30.09.2015, IX GC 1229/13.
Judgment of the Regional Court in Sieradz of 27.07.2015, I C 219/11.
Judgment of the Regional Court in Warsaw of 5.09.2018, XXV C 1805/16.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 10.05.2021, V CSKP 45/21.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 13.02.2015, II CSK 232/14.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 14.01.2005, III CK 193/04.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 14.10.2005, III CK 101/05.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 15.06.2022, II CSKP 380/22.
judgment of the Supreme Court of 22.01.2008, II CSK 377/07.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 28.01.2015, I CSK 741/13.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 28.01.2015, I CSK 741/13.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 29.01.2021, V CSKP 2/21.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 5.12.2008, III CSK 211/08.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 6.5.2011, II CSK 520/10.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 7.8.2014, II CSK 580/13.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 9.07.2020, V CSK 502/18.
Judgment of the Supreme Court V CSK 164/11 8.3.2012.
Judgment of the Voivodship Administrative Court in Olsztyn of 28.11.2019, I SA/Ol 519/19.
Karaszewski, G. (2023). [No title]. In J. Ciszewski & P. Nazaruk (Eds.), Civil Code. Comment. SIP Lex.
Karwatowicz, G., & Zawiślańska, A. (2013). Financial corrections for violation of public procurement law in EU projects. Wrocław.
Kocot, W.J. (2013). Pre-contractual responsibility. Warsaw.
Kozieł, G. (2018). Agreement on co-financing of an entrepreneur from European Union funds, Legal nature of the contract. In A. Kidyba (Ed.), Non-code commercial agreements. WKP.
Machnikowski, P. (2023). [No title]. In A. Olejniczak (Ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego, vol. 6. C.H. Beck.
Nicolaides, P. (2009). The incentive effect of state aid. Its Meaning, Measurement, Pitfalls and Application. World Competition 32(4).
Olejniczak, A. (2014). Article 361. In A. Kidyba A. (Ed.), Civil Code. Comment. Volume III. Commitments - general part.
Pajor, T. (1982). Liability of the debtor for non-performance of an obligation. Warsaw.
Poździk, R. (2013). Evaluation and selection of projects for co-financing from the European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund and Cohesion Fund. Warsaw.
Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24.06.2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Internal Security Fund and the of the instrument for financial support for border management and visa policy (OJ. EU L 231/159).
Savchuk, V.S. (2011). Jurisdiction of administrative courts and ordinary courts in matters of distribution of EU funds on the example of the distribution of funds under development policy. ZNSA 6.
Sieczych-Drzewiecka, A. (2020). Possible damage and loss of opportunity. Limits of the obligation to compensate. SIP Lex.
Szczepaniak, R. (2014). Selected problems related to the interweaving of civil law and administrative-legal methods of regulation on the example of the provisions of the Act on the principles of conducting development policy. Private Law Studies 3.
Talaga, R. (2019). Evolution of the project co-financing agreement from European funds in the Polish legal system. Ius Novum 1.
Wilejczyk, M. (2016). Reserve reason – an unacceptable gift for the person responsible for the damage. Przegląd Sądowy 6.
Wyszomirski, Ł.M. (2013). Reimbursement of European funds by the beneficiary. ZNSA 1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Krzysztof Brysiewicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
