Social Protection of Digital Platform Workers under Norwegian Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.02.03Keywords:
digital platform work, concept of ‘worker’, employment law, social insurance law, Covid 19-pandemicAbstract
The main aim of this article is to investigate some encounters between the Norwegian system of economic risk-pooling for labour engaging individuals, and the emerging digital platform economy. The author argues that Norwegian labour and employment law, as well as social insurance law, may fall short in alleviating the economic strains of the typical digital platform worker in cases of loss of income. This is partly due to legal classification: Where Norwegian labour and employment law operates with two categories of labour engaging individuals: employees and non-employees, Norwegian social insurance law includes three categories: employees, freelancers, and self-employed persons. Employees are entitled to the most comprehensive and high-level coverage of income losses. The legal status of digital platform workers is basically unclear, and they may belong to each of the three categories, depending on contract terms. It is also argued that the Covid 19-pandemic has reinforced the differences between salaried, full-time, employees, and atypical workers such as digital platform workers. The compensation measures issued by the Norwegian state to cover income losses in relation to the pandemic did not meet the needs of the typical – freelance – digital platform worker to the same extent as those of undertakings and ‘traditional’ employees. The article suggests some measures to clarify the legal position and to give a better coverage for digital platform workers in cases of loss of income.
Downloads
References
Hjelmeng, E. (2016). The Concept of an «Undertaking» – On the Borderline between Labour Law and Competition Law. In B.J. Mulder, M.J. Hotvedt, M. Nesvik & T.L. Sundet (Eds), Sui Generis: Festskrift til Stein Evju. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, s. 316-326.
Hotvedt, M.J. (2016). Arbeidsgiveransvar i formidlingsøkonomien? Tilfellet Uber. Lov og rett, 55(8), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3061-2016-08-03
Hotvedt, M.J. (2018a).The contract-of-employment test renewed, A Scandinavian approach to platform work. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal, 7(1-2):56. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/sllerj.2018.4436
Hotvedt, M.J. (2018b). ARBEIDSTAKER – QUO VADIS? Den nyere utviklingen av arbeidstakerbegrepet [Employee – quo vadis? The newer development of the concept of employee], Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap (1), 42-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2018-01-02
Hotvedt, M.J. (2020a). Kollektive forhandlinger for oppdragstakere? Rekkevidden av adgangen til å forhandle tariffavtaler i lys av internasjonal rettsutvikling [Collective bargaining for contractors? The scope of the right to conclude collective agreements in the light of development in international law]. Arbeidsrett, 17(1), 1-44.
Hotvedt, M.J. (2020b). Protection of platform workers in Norway Part 2 Country report. Nordic future of work project 2017–2020: Working paper 09. Pillar VI. Fafo 2020. https://www.fafo.no/images/pub/2020/Nfow-wp9.pdf
Jesnes, K. & Oppegaard S.M.N. (Eds) (2020). Platform Work in the Nordic Models: Issues, cases and responses’, Report from the project ‘The Future of Work, Opportunities and Challenges for the Nordic Models’, Nordic Council of Ministers. http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/temanord2020-513
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tine Eidsvaag
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
