Legal Regulation of Remote Work in Slovakia and the Covid-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.02.01Keywords:
home work, telework, remote work, place of work, right to disconnect, covid-19, workplace privacyAbstract
This paper aims to examine the development of the legal regulation of remote working arrangements in Slovak labour law and to determine the main legal issues that keep this type of work from being more widely utilised in practice. To this end, the article analyses the applicable provisions of the Slovak Labour code, as they developed throughout the years, in particular the changes implemented in connection with the Covid-19n pandemic. It also investigates other applicable sources of law, as well as case law and relevant literature. The main issues identified by the article that need to be addressed by the legislator, involve three areas: (i.) formulation of the place of work in the employment agreement, (ii.) working time and rest periods of remote workers and (iii.) the range of supervisory powers of the employer vis-à-vis remote workers. The author argues that the legislator ought to create more favourable and clear legal conditions for remote work and to enable this type of work to be performed under all contractual types recognised by Slovak labour law, not just in the (standard) employment relationship.
Downloads
References
Barancová, H. (2020). Domácka práca a telepráca. In Z. Nevolná & M. Hlušák (Eds.), Laudatio Alexandrovi Škrinárovi (pp 10-25). Trnava: Trnavská univerzita v Trnave, Právnická fakulta. Retrieved from http://publikacie.iuridica.truni.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Laudatio-Alexandrovi-Skrinarovi_online.pdf.
Barancová, H. et al. (2019) Zákonník práce. (2nd edition). Bratislava: C.H. Beck.
Barancová, H., & Schronk, R. (2018). Pracovné právo (4th edition). Bratislava: Sprint 2
Case of Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], Application no. 27238/95.
Case of Copland v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 62617/00.
Case of Klass and others v. Germany, Application no. 5029/71 I. ÚS 274/05, II. ÚS 280/09-16.
Case of Lüdi v. Switzerland, Application no. 12433/86.
Case of Menteş and Others v. Turkey, Application no. 23186/94.
Case of Niemietz v. Germany, Application no. 13710/88.
Case of Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finland, Application no. 50882/99.
Case of Saber v. Norway, Application no. 459/18.
Case of Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, Application no. 74336/01.
Constitution of the Slovak Republic (No. 460/1992 Coll.).
Council Directive 89/654/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace.
Council directive 90/270/EEC on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment.
Decree of the Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic No. 508/2009 Coll.
ETUC, UNICE, UEAPME & CEEP (2002). Framework agreement on. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?mode=dsw&docId=10418&langId=en.
Eurofound (2010). Telework in the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_files/docs/eiro/tn0910050s/tn0910050s.pdf
Eurofound (2020). Telework and ICT-based mobile work: Flexible working in the digital age. New forms of employment series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/337167.
Eurofound (2021). Working during COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/covid-19/working-teleworking
Greguš, J. (2016). Právna úprava domáckej práce a telepráce v kontextu novely Zákonníka práce. Paper presented at the conference „Pracovní právo 2016 na téma Zákoník práce v novelizaci, důchodová reforma v akci“. Masaryk university, Faculty of Law. Retrieved from https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/pracpravo2016/files/009.html#_ftn12
International Labour Organisation (1996). C-177 Home Work Convention. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312322
Judgement of the Court of Justice of the EU of 14 May 2019 in case C‑55/18, Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) vs. Deutsche Bank SAE.
Judgement of the Supreme court of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic R 10/1971
Judgement of the Supreme court of the Slovak republic 5 Cdo 81/2010.
Judgement of the Supreme court of the Slovak republic 5 Cdo 81/2010.
Judgment of 6 July 2000, C-11/99 Margrit Dietrich v Westdeutscher Rundfunk.
Labour Code (2012). Act No. 311/2001 Coll. of 2 July 2001, as amended. English version. Retrieved from https://www.employment.gov.sk/files/praca-zamestnanost/vztah-zamestnanca-zamestnavatela/zakonnik-prace/zakonnik-prace-anglicka-verzia-labour-code-full-wording-2012.pdf.
Memorandum to the amendment No. 76/2021 Coll. Retrieved from https://www.nrsr.sk/web/Default.aspx?sid=zakony/zakon&MasterID=8022.
National labour inspectorate (n.d.), Homeoffice a BOZP – aktualizácia. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.ip.gov.sk/homeoffice-a-bozp/.
Olšovská, A. (2017). Pracovný pomer. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.
Olšovská, A., & Laclavíková, M. (2018). Miesto výkonu práce a jeho modifikácie. In M. Švec & M. Bulla (Eds.), Práca 4.0, digitálna spoločnosť a pracovné právo (pp 36-48). Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, zastúpenie v SR.
Regulation of the Government of the Slovak republic No. 276/2006 Coll. on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display units.
Regulation of the Government of the Slovak republic No. 391/2006 Coll. on the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace.
Regulation of the Government of the Slovak Republic No. 392/2006 Coll. on the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment.
Schronk, R. (2018) Zákonník práce a jeho novelizácie. Šamorín: Heuréka Heuréka.
Tomšej, J. (2015). Home-office a problematika bezpečnosti a ochrany zdraví při práci. In: J. Pichrt, & J. Morávek (Eds.), Atypická zaměstnání – cesta k vyšší zaměstnanosti? Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.
Varga, P. (2016). Pracovný čas pracovníkov bez stáleho pracoviska a nárok na náhradu za nevyčerpanú dovolenku za kalendárny rok v prípade úmrtia pracovníka. Justičná revue, 68(12), 1436-1443.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Martin Bulla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
