The Erasmus+ EduLAw Project for Strengthening Rights-based Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2017.01.01.02Keywords:
EduLAw (ELA) project, law modules for teacher training programs, autonomy of schools, rights-based decision making in educationAbstract
The purpose of the article is to explore the relevance of the EduLAw (ELA) project on law modules for teacher training courses, illustrated in the case study of the legal developments in the Flemish Community of Belgium. The article analyses this issue by addressing two key points: firstly, it explains the background and relevance of the EduLAw project and recent European developments; secondly it illustrates how policymakers of the Flemish Community of Belgium have responded through public law to demands for stricter review of decisions about individual pupils of teachers, school principals and school boards on issues such as discipline and special needs requests. A short description of the relevant characteristics of the education system in the Flemish Community of Belgium, is followed by an examination of two 2014 decrees on education and their innovative response to demands for more transparency and legal certainty in rights-based decision making about pupils by teachers, school officials and school boards. The analyses reveal that educational reforms are increasingly linked with the political cause of equality (Groof, Fussel, & Lauwers, 2008, p. 223) and transparency in decision making of administrations, including school officials, especially decisions affecting the rights of individual pupils in education. Public law is thereby used to build in constraints as to how school autonomy and discretion of teachers, school officials and school boards should be exercised. The analyses also reveal the link between substantive requirements of good decision-making and procedural requirements. Procedural obligations in their turn opened the way for more substantive control by the court in disciplinary procedures, and enrolment of pupils with special education needs. The article concludes that, although schools still have autonomy to fashion their own school regulations , it is clear that the two decrees have, through procedural requirements and substantive principles of administrative legality, intruded into this area. Thus, these changed circumstances require teachers, school principals and school boards to be trained in rights-based decision making. This is what the EduLAw is trying to accomplish.
Downloads
References
Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering houdende de codificatie betreffende het secundair onderwijs [Codex Secondary Education] (2010). B.S.24/06/2011. Retrieved from https://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/document.aspx?docid=14289#308272
Craane, T. (2015). Het M-decreet onder de loep genomen (Master thesis). Universiteit Antwerpen.
De Vroey, A. (2016). Inclusive practices and co-support in Flemish secondary schools. A qualitative study on inclusive school development (Doctoral thesis). University of Leuven.
Decreet betreffende maatregelen voor leerlingen met specifieke onderwijsbehoeften (2014). B.S.28/08/2014.
Decreet houdende diverse maatregelen betreffende de rechtspositie van leerlingen in het basis- en secundair onderwijs en betreffende de participatie op school (2014). B.S.20/08/2014.
Deschacht, B. (2015). Onderzoek: inclusief onderwijs en M - decreet: realisatie bij leerkrachten.
European Commission. (n.d.). Education and Training Monitor 2016 Belgium. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/fi les/monitor2016-be_en.pdf
European Parliament v. Council, C-540/03 (2006). ECLI:EU:C:2006:429.
Flemish Children’s Rights Commissioner’s Office. (2015). Report on children’s rights for specific groups in Flanders (pp. 1–15). Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.kinderrechtencommissariaat.be/sites/default/files/bestanden/prepkrc4muiznieks_15_09_2015.pdf
General comment No. 9 (2006): The rights of children with disabilities (2007). CRC/C/GC/9. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/461b93f72.html
Groof, J. D. (1983). Recht op en vrijheid van onderwijs. CEPESS.
Groof, J. D., Fussel, H.-P., & Lauwers, G. (Eds.). (2008). Inequality in Education. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Groof, J. D., & Lauwers, G. (Eds.). (2003). Special Education: Yearbook of the European Association for Education Law and Policy. Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from //www.springer.com/gp/book/9781402015458
Heubert, J. (1997). The More We Get Together: Improving Collaboration between Educators and Their Lawyers. Harvard Educational Review, 67(3), 531–583. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.3.595072k230471549
Lauwers, G. (2006). De bewijslast in het geval van segregatie in het onderwijs volgens het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Tijdschrift voor onderwijsrecht en onderwijsbeleid, (3), 143–152.
Lauwers, G. (2012). Deel 2 van het advies op de Implementatie van het VN-verdrag voor personen met een handicap: advies Steunpunt Recht en Onderwijs. In opdracht van het Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap.
M-Decree for special education needs children. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/education/compendium/m-decree-special-education-needs-children_en
Ministry of Education (of the Flemish Community of Belgium). (2017). Interim metaevaluation of the M-decree. Retrieved from http://onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/nl/tussentijdse-meta-evaluatie-m-decreet
Rights of the child. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/justice-and-fundamental-rights/rights-child_en
Statistisch jaarboek van het Vlaams onderwijs schooljaar 2013-2014. (2015). Retrieved from http://ebl.vlaanderen.be/publications/documents/69187
Van der Spiegel, R. (2016). De rol en positie van ouders binnen incusief onderwijs voor de invoering van het M-decreet (Master thesis). Universiteit Antwerpen.
Van segregatie naar inclusie [From segregation to inclusion]. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2017, from /nl/grote-lijnen-van-het-m-decreet
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Gracienne Lauwers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
