Advance Will: Ensuring the Right to Autonomy for People with Mental Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2019.03.02.05Keywords:
advance will, advance directives, right to autonomy, mental illness, mental disability, mental health, mental health careAbstract
People with chronic mental illnesses (e.g. bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, dementia, etc.) find it hard to maintain normal and independent everyday life. Due to these illnesses, people usually lose competence to make autonomous decisions about their treatment. However, in some cases those people are still competent to make reasonable decisions before the times of relapse or at the early stage of disease. As a possible solution, some jurisdictions offer instruments to express a patient’s will in advance (e. g. advance directives), where mentally ill patients may state their treatment and care preferences for the future time of incompetency. Although there is a lot of criticism presented by the scholars, legal instruments based on advance will may undoubtedly contribute to ensuring mentally disabled patients’ fundamental rights and quality of life. Therefore, this article will include an introduction of advance directives, the advantages this tool represents and discuss main regulation challenges.
Downloads
References
Appelbaum, P. S. (1991). Advance Directives for Psychiatric Treatment. Psychiatric Services, 42(10), 983–984. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.42.10.983.
Brådvik, L. (2018). Suicide risk and mental disorders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092028.
Brodoff, L. E. (2010). Planning for Alzheimer’s Disease with Mental Health Advance Directives. Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons, 239.
Burch, M. (2017). Autonomy, respect, and the rights of persons with disabilities in crisis. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12248.
Clausen, J. A. (2015). Making the case for a model mental health advance directive statute. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 14(1), 1–65.
Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 1(1), 16–20. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16946807%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC1489832.
Dunlap, J. A. (2000). Mental health advance directives: having one’s say? Kentucky Law Journal (Lexington, Ky.), 89(2), 327–386. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2455720.
Duxbury, J. (2015). Minimizing the use of coercive practices in mental health: the perfect storm. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(2), 89–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12206.
Elbogen, E. B., Swartz, M. S., Van Dorn, R., Swanson, J. W., Kim, M., & Scheyett, A. (2006). Clinical Decision Making and Views About Psychiatric Advance Directives. Psychiatric Services, 57(3), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.350.
Gooding, P. (2013). Supported decision-making: A rights-based disability concept and its implications for mental health law. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.711683.
Gooding, P., Mcsherry, B., Roper, C., & Grey, F. (2018). Alternatives to Coercion in Mental Health Settings: A Literature Review. Melbourne Social Equity Institute.
Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Pasandin, N., Zullino, D., & Preisig, M. (2009). Advance directives based on cognitive therapy: A way to overcome coercion related problems. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.006.
La Fond, J. Q., & Srebnik, D. (2002). The impact of mental health advance directives on patient perceptions of coercion in civil commitment and treatment decisions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25(6), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-2527(02)00182-6.
Mahon, M. M. (2011). An advance directive in two questions. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(4), 801–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.01.002
Mental Health Foundation. (2016). Fundamental facts about mental health. Mental Health Foundation, 89. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/fundamental-facts-about-mental-health-2016.pdf [11.12.2019].
Nicaise, P., Lorant, V., & Dubois, V. (2013). Psychiatric Advance Directives as a complex and multistage intervention: A realist systematic review. Health and Social Care in the Community, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01062.x
Pinto, R. Z., Ferreira, M. L., Oliveira, V. C., Franco, M. R., Adams, R., Maher, C. G., & Ferreira, P. H. (2012). Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 58(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70087-5.
Ritchie, J., Sklar, R., & Steiner, W. (1998). Advance directives in psychiatry: Resolving issues of autonomy and competence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00017-X.
Samanta, A., & Samanta, J. (2005). The Human Rights Act 1998 - Why should it matter for medical practice? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98(9), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.98.9.404.
Sellars, M., Fullam, R., O’Leary, C., Mountjoy, R., Mawren, D., Weller, P., … Silvester, W. (2017). Australian Psychiatrists’ Support for Psychiatric Advance Directives: Responses to a Hypothetical Vignette. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1198224.
Srebnik, D. S., & La Fond, J. Q. (1999). Advance directives for mental health treatment. Psychiatric Services, 50(7), 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.27.11.437-a.
Swanson, J. W., McCrary, S., Van, Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E. B., & Van Dorn, R. A.(2006). Superseding psychiatric advance directives: ethical and legal considerations. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34(3), 385–394. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17032962 [11.12.2019].
Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E. B., Van Dorn, R. A., Wagner, H. R., Moser, L. A., Wilder, Ch., & Gilbert, A. R. (2008). Psychiatric advance directives and reduction of coercive crisis interventions. Journal of Mental Health, 17(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230802052195. Psychiatric.
Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., & Elbogen, E. B. (2004). Psychiatric Advance Directives: Practical, Legal, and Ethical Issues. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(4), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1300/j158v04n04_07.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol, A/RES/61/1. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100310.
Wilder, C. M., Elbogen, E. B., Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., & Van Dorn, R. A. (2007). Effect of Patients’ Reasons for Refusing Treatment on Implementing Psychiatric Advance Directives. Psychiatric Services, 58(10), 1348–1350. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.58.10.1348.
Winick, B. J. (1996). Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness. University of Miami Law Review, 51(1), 57–95.
World Health Organization. (2001). World Health Report. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/whr/2001/media_centre/press_release/en/ [11.12.2019].
World Health Organization. (2019). Mental Disorders. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders [11.12.2019].
Žaliauskaitė, M. (2015). Mental Health Advance Directives: Could This Type Of Contract Exist Under Today’s Law In Lithuania? Vytautas Magnus University. Retrieved from https://vb.vdu.lt/object/elaba:8768771/ [11.12.2019].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Milda Žaliauskaitė
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
