Caught in the Middle: Overcompliance and Non-Compliance with EU Sanctions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.03.06Keywords:
overcompliance, EU sanctions, regulatory uncertainty, obligation of result, compliance responsibilityAbstract
This article examines the phenomenon of overcompliance with European Union (EU) sanctions, particularly in the context of measures imposed in response to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overcompliance occurs when companies and individuals exceed the legal requirements of sanctions, often due to regulatory uncertainty, broad and ambiguous legal provisions, overlapping responsibilities, ethical considerations, and external pressures such as public opinion. The article situates EU sanctions within both foreign policy and domestic regulatory frameworks, highlighting the dual expectation placed on EU companies: to further geopolitical objectives while independently interpreting and implementing complex regulations in daily operations. The lack of precise, binding guidance from EU authorities compels companies to calibrate their own compliance measures, leading to a cautious approach that can blur the line between compliance and overcompliance. The article argues that overcompliance is not merely an anomaly but also an inherent feature of the EU sanctions regime, reinforced by the “obligation of result” approach. To navigate this landscape, companies are encouraged to take proactive ownership of their compliance processes – assessing, documenting, and communicating their roles and responsibilities, and engaging with other stakeholders to clarify expectations. Ultimately, effective sanctions implementation depends on informed, calibrated, and collaborative compliance strategies that balance the risks of both overcompliance and non-compliance, with the overarching aim of securing the sought-after middle ground.
Downloads
References
Baldwin, D.A. (2020). Economic Statecraft. New Edition. Princeton University Press.
Bismuth, R. & Dunin-Wasowicz, J. (2024). ‘Towards a New Extraterritoriality of EU Sanctions?’. In C. Zilioli, R. Bismuth & L. Thévenoz (Eds.), International Sanctions: Monetary and Financial Law Perspectives (pp. 123-145). Brill Nijhoff.
Commission Consolidated FAQs, on the implementation of Council Regulation No. 833/2014 and Council Regulation No 269/2014.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/1318 of 30 July 2019 on internal compliance programmes for dual-use trade controls under Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009, C/2019/5528, OJ L 205, 5.8.2019, p. 15–32.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1700 of 15 September 2021 on internal compliance programmes for controls of research involving dual-use items under Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items.
Cortright D. and Lopez A. (2000). The Sanctions Decade, Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990’s. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1214 of 23 June 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, OJ L 159I, 23.6.2023, p. 1–329.
Couwenbergh, P. (2022, 14 July). Carlsberg-ceo Cees 't Hart over vertrek uit Rusland. 'Alsof de regels van het schaakspel werden herschreven', [Interview with Carlsberg CEO about withdrawal from Russia]. Financieel Dagblad.
Directive (EU) 2018/1673 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on combating money laundering by criminal law, OJ L 284, 12.11.2018, p. 22–30.
Directive (EU) 2024/1226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the definition of criminal offences and penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures and amending Directive (EU) 2018/1673, OJ L, 2024/1226, 29.4.2024.
Eurostat (2024, 25 October). ‘Micro & small businesses make up 99% of enterprises in the EU’, Newsarticle.
Geursen, W.W. (2024). Mapping the territorial scope of EU law. [PhD-Thesis - Research and graduation internal, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. Eleven. https://doi.org/10.5463/thesis.515.
Giumelli, F., Hoffmann, F., & Książczaková, A. (2020). The when, what, where and why of European Union sanctions. European Security, 30(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1797685.
Hoye, J.M. (2024). OFAC, Famine, and the Sanctioning of Afghanistan: A Catastrophic Policy Success. New Political Science, 46(2), 150-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2024.2339127.
Koopmans, T. (1991). ‘De rol van de wetgever’. In H.C.F. Schoordijk, W.C.L. van der Grinten, C.H.F. Polak & G.E. Langemeijer (Eds.), Honderd jaar rechtsleven: de Nederlandse Juristen-Vereniging 1870-1970 (pp. 221-235). Tjeenk Willink 1970 [Juridisch Stippelwerk].
Opinion of the European Banking Authority on ‘de-risking’ EBA/Op/2022/01, 5 January 2022.
Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (recast), OJ L 206, 11.6.2021, p. 1–461.
UN OHCHR (2022). Guidance Note on Overcompliance with Unilateral Sanctions and its Harmful Effects on Human Rights. Special Rapporteur on unilateral coercive measures. https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-unilateral-coercive-measures/resources-unilateral-coercive-measures/guidance-note-overcompliance-unilateral-sanctions-and-its-harmful-effects-human-rights.
Wright Mills, C. (1956). The Power Elite. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
