The Dutch Perspective on the Enforcement of the EU Sanctions Against Russia: Legal Challenges, Case Law, and Institutional Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.03.05Keywords:
Netherlands sanctions enforcement model, Dutch Sanctions Act Reform, duty of care in Dutch sanctions jurisprudence, sanctions enforcement in Dutch jurisprudenceAbstract
This article examines the evolving legal and institutional framework for implementing and enforcing EU sanctions against Russia in the Netherlands. It highlights key developments, including the Dutch courts’ expanding interpretation of sanctions law, the landmark Dieseko settlement involving the Crimean Bridge, and reforms to the 1977 Sanctions Act. Drawing on recent case law, interviews with legal practitioners, and analysis of enforcement mechanisms, the paper shows how Dutch authorities are balancing regulatory compliance, due process, and financial sector duties. It also addresses institutional fragmentation and the government’s proposal to establish a Central Reporting Office. Through case studies, including trade-based sanctions evasion, real estate linked to sanctioned individuals, forced buyouts of sanctioned minority shareholders, and banking sector disputes; the paper argues that Dutch courts are shaping a nuanced national model of sanctions enforcement. This model emphasizes low thresholds for criminal intent, transparency, and proportionality. The Cicerone case illustrates how courts adapt sanctions enforcement under geopolitical uncertainty, combining EU sanctions law with Ukrainian anti-corruption efforts. It reflects a willingness to diverge from EU guidance to protect public interest and legal clarity. Meanwhile, the ABN AMRO case demonstrates a dual expectation of financial institutions: rigorous sanctions compliance and fair treatment of clients. Here, the duty of care doctrine counters excessive risk aversion. Together, this paper offers critical insights for regulators, compliance professionals, and scholars into how EU sanctions are interpreted and enforced at the national level under complex, high-risk conditions. It not only analyzes key court cases, but also contextualizes them within broader legal reforms, institutional dynamics, and evolving enforcement strategies in the Netherlands.
Downloads
References
Amsterdam Alternative. (2024, March 19). Vossiusstraat 16 under threat – Removal of Russian oligarch Arkady Volozh from the sanctions list. https://amsterdamalternative.nl/articles/15662/vossiusstraat-16-under-threat-removal-of-russian-oligarch-arkady-volozh-from-the-sanctions-list.
Amar, Y. (2024). The new Dutch act on international sanctions measures: A first analysis. Den Hollander. https://denhollander.info/artikel/18425
Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM). (n.d.). About the AFM. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.afm.nl/en/over-de-afm.
Belastingdienst. (n.d.). CDIU cluster. https://www.belastingdienst.nl/wps/wcm/connect/bldcontenten/belastingdienst/customs/safety_health_economy_and_environment/cdiu_cluster/.
Bureau Toetsing Investeringen. (n.d.). Sanctions overview. https://www.bureautoetsinginvesteringen.nl/het-stelsel-van-toetsen/sancties
Bureau Toetsing Investeringen. (n.d.). Wet veiligheidstoets investeringen, fusies en overnames. https://www.bureautoetsinginvesteringen.nl/het-stelsel-van-toetsen/wet-veiligheidstoets-investeringen-fusies-en-overnames.
BWC Implementation. (1950). Wet op de economische delicten [Economic Offences Act]. https://bwcimplementation.org/sites/default/files/resource/NL_Economic%20Offences%20Acr%201950_NL.pdf.
Chapter 3, International Sanctions Measures Act. (n.d.). https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/sanctiemaatregelen/b1
De Nederlandsche Bank. (n.d.). De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) – The central bank of the Netherlands. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.dnb.nl/en/.
Dieseko Group. (2024, July). Public statement on Crimean Bridge. https://www.diesekogroup.com/press/.
Duane Morris LLP. (n.d.). European sanctions enforcement: Netherlands. https://blogs.duanemorris.com/europeansanctionsenforcement/tag/netherlands/.
European Commission. (2021, May 27). Commission opinion on changes to the features of frozen funds. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/210527-frozen-funds-features-opinion_en.pdf
FIOD. (2024, March 26). Aanhouding vanwege terrorismefinanciering met bitcoins. https://www.fiod.nl/aanhouding-vanwege-terrorismefinanciering-met-bitcoins/.
FIOD. (n.d.). About FIOD. https://www.fiod.nl/.
Fiscale Inlichtingen- en Opsporingsdienst (FIOD). (n.d.). FIOD – Fiscale Inlichtingen- en Opsporingsdienst. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.fiod.nl/
Government of the Netherlands. (n.d.). Facts and figures on the sanctions against Russia and Belarus. https://www.government.nl/topics/russia-and-ukraine/sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus/facts-and-figures-on-the-sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus.
Government of the Netherlands. (n.d.). Search results for sanctions. https://www.government.nl/search?keyword=sanctions&search-submit=.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands. (n.d.). Facts and figures on the sanctions against Russia and Belarus. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.government.nl/topics/russia-and-ukraine/sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus/facts-and-figures-on-the-sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus.
Netherlands Public Prosecution Service. (2024). Investigation claim: The criminal investigation into Dieseko Group B.V. – Statement of facts and conclusions. National Office for Serious Fraud, Environmental Crime and Asset Confiscation (Functioneel Parket). https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/documents/publications/fp/hoge-transacties/feitenrelaas/statement-of-facts-and-conclusions-npps-dieseko.
Netherlands Public Prosecution Service. (2024, July 11). Dieseko Group B.V. accepts settlement agreement with the Netherlands Public Prosecution Service. Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/latest/news/2024/07/11/dieseko-group-b.v.-accepts-settlement-agreement-with-the-netherlands-public-prosecution-service.
OM. (n.d.). Public Prosecution Service. https://www.om.nl/.
Ostiller, N., & The Kyiv Independent news desk. (2024, March 13). EU removes sanctions against Yandex co-founder Volozh. The Kyiv Independent. https://kyivindependent.com/eu-removes-sanctions-against-yandex-co-founder-volozh.
Rechtspraak. (2022). Case No: C/13/717154 / KG ZA 22-388 (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2022:3141). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2022:3141.
Rechtspraak. (2023). Case No: 200.319.821/01 (ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:1058). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:1058.
Rechtspraak. (2023). Case No: C/10/665575 / KG ZA 23-835 (ECLI:NL:RBROT:2023:10109). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2023:10109.
Rechtspraak. (2024). Case No: 3-151106-23 (ECLI:NL:RBROT:2024:9673)
Rechtspraak. (2024). Case No: 81.298767.21 (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:8568). https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:8568.
Rechtspraak. (2024). Case No: ECLI:NL:PHR:2024:628. https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:PHR:2024:628.
WED. (1950). Wet op de economische delicten [Economic Offences Act]. BWC Implementation. https://bwcimplementation.org/sites/default/files/resource/NL_Economic%20Offences%20Acr%201950_NL.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
