Terminological Developments in the Criminalization of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) in International and European Union Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.02.01Keywords:
CSAM, CSEM, child sexual abuse, soft law, terminologyAbstract
This paper examines the evolving terminology used in international and European Union law concerning the criminalization of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The analysis focuses on both binding legal instruments and soft law documents, tracing conceptual and definitional developments that have occurred over the past two decades. The study addresses two core research questions: (1) how do international and European legal frameworks define and conceptualize CSAM, and what definitional variations exist? (2) what terminological trends and shifts can be identified in recent international and European legal discourse, and what role have soft law instruments played in driving terminological evolution in relation to binding legal instruments? By comparing the approaches reflected in key binding and non-binding instruments, such as the Lanzarote Convention, EU Directive 2011/93/EU, the UNCC, and recent policy documents adopted by international organizations, the article highlights the gradual shift toward more precise and victim-centered terminology. The findings reveal a gradual move toward more precise, harm-based, and victim-centered terminology, reflecting broader normative and policy developments in the field of child protection, driven primarily by the soft law instruments.
Downloads
References
5Rights Foundation. (2021). Explanatory Notes: UNCRC General Comment No. 25 (2021) — Children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. https://5rightsfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ExplanatoryNotes_UNCRCGC25.pdf.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280.
Child Rescue Coalition (n.d.). Call It What It Is. Help Us Change Legislation from Child Pornography To CSAM. https://childrescuecoalition.org/educations/call-it-what-it-is-help-us-change-legislation-from-child-pornography-to-csam/.
Commission on Human Rights. (1990). Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1990/68 of 7 March 1990 on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, E/CN.4/RES/1990/68. https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unchr/1990/en/6527.
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2011). General Comment No. 13 on the right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence (CRC/C/GC/13). United Nations. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/crc/2011/en/82269.
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2021). General Comment No. 25 on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment (CRC/C/GC/25). United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3906061.
Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680081561.
Council of Europe. (2001). Explanatory Report to the Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/16800cce5b.
Council of Europe. (2007). Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (CETS No. 201). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680084822.
Council of Europe. (2008). Explanatory Report to the Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (CETS No. 201). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/16800d3832.
Council of Europe. (2018). Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Guidelines to Respect, Protect and Fulfil the Rights of the Child in the Digital Environment. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016808b79f7.
Council of Europe. (2019). Handbook for Policy Makers on the Rights of the Child in the Digital Environment. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/handbook-for-policy-makers-on-the-rights-of-the-child-in-the-digital-e/1680a069f8.
Council of Europe. (2025). Thematic guidance note: Safeguarding children from the risks of accessing online pornographic content. https://rm.coe.int/cdenf-2024-20-final-guidance-note-on-safeguarding-children-from-the-ri/1680b4bc32.
Council of the European Union. Council Decision of 29 May 2000 to combat child pornography on the Internet (2000/375/JHA), OJ L 138, 09.06.2000, pp. 1–4, ELI: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2000/375/oj/eng.
Dąbrowska, M. (2025). Propozycja reform terminologicznych dotyczących kryminalizacji materiałów przedstawiających wykorzystywanie seksualne małoletnich (CSAM) w polskim prawie karnym. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, 68. https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.11036.
Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA, Official Journal of the European Union, L 335, 17 December 2011, pp. 1–14. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/93/oj.
ECPAT International & ECPAT Luxembourg. (2016). Terminology guidelines for the protection of children from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. https://ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Terminology-guidelines-396922-EN-1.pdf.
ECPAT International. (2025). Terminology guidelines for the protection of children from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse (2nd ed.). https://ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Second-Edition-Terminology-Guidelines-final.pdf.
Edwards, S. S. M. (2000). Prosecuting “child pornography”: Possession and taking of indecent photographs of children. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/014180300362732.
European Commission. (2020). Communication COM(2020) 607 final: EU Strategy for a More Effective Fight Against Child Sexual Abuse. Brussels, 24 July 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0607.
European Commission. (2025). Communication C/2025/6826: Guidelines on Measures to Ensure a High Level of Privacy, Safety and Security for Minors Online, pursuant to Article 28(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. Official Journal of the European Union, C C/2025/5519, 10 October 2025. http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5519/oj.
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, pp. 1–102). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng.
European Parliament. (2016). Resolution of 11 March 2015 on child sexual abuse online (2015/2564(RSP)). Official Journal of the European Union, C 316, 30 August 2016, pp. 109–112. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015IP0070&qid=1763364864018.
Europol. (2020). Exploiting isolation: Offenders and victims of online child sexual abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Gillespie, A. (2010). Legal definitions of child pornography. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903262097.
Global CSAM Legislative Overview. (2024). INHOPE Association.
Hagemann, R., Skees, J. H., & Thierer, A. (2018). Soft Law For Hard Problems: The Governance Of Emerging Technologies In An Uncertain Future,. Colorado Technology Law Journa, 17(1), 37–130.
Human Rights Council. (2017). Human Rights Council Resolution 34/16 of 24 March 2017 renewing the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1288947?ln=en&v=pdf#files.
Human Rights Council. (2023). Human Rights Council Resolution 52/26 of 4 April 2023 renewing the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (A/HRC/RES/52/26). https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/RES/52/26.
Interagency Working Group on the OPSC Guidelines & ECPAT International. (2019). Explanatory Report to the Guidelines regarding the implementation of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography. https://www.ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/OPSC-Guidelines-Explanatory-Report-ECPAT-International-2019.pdf.
INTERPOL. (n.d.). Appropriate terminology. https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Crimes-against-children/Appropriate-terminology.
Lanzarote Committee. (2016). Declaration on web addresses advertising or promoting child sexual abuse material or images or any other offences established in accordance with the Lanzarote Convention. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168066cffa.
Lanzarote Committee. (2022). Thematic implementation report: The protection of children against sexual exploitation and sexual abuse facilitated by information and communication technologies (ICTs). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/implementation-report-on-the-2nd-monitoring-round-the-protection-of-ch/1680a619c4.
Lanzarote Committee. (2023). 7th activity report of the Lanzarote Committee (covering the period 1 July 2021–2 February 2023). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/7th-activity-report-of-the-lanzarote-committee/1680aa8e3a.
Martin, J. (2014). “It’s Just an Image, Right?”: Practitioners’ Understanding of Child Sexual Abuse Images Online and Effects on Victims. Child & Youth Services, 35(2), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2014.924334.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2014). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (A/HRC/28/56). https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/28/56
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2016). 25 Years of Fighting the Sale and Sexual Exploitation of Children: Handbook. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Children/SR/25YearsMandate.pdf.
Ost, S. (2010). Criminalising fabricated images of child pornography: A matter of harm or morality? Legal Studies, 30(2), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00161.x.
Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 July 2021 on a temporary derogation from certain provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC as regards the use of technologies by providers of number independent interpersonal communications services for the processing of personal and other data for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse (Text with EEA relevance, consolidated version 15 May 2024), Official Journal of the European Union. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1232/2024-05-15.
Scher-Zagier, E. (2025). Jurisdictional Creep: The UN Cybercrime Convention and the Expansion of Passive Personality Jurisdiction. Yale JL & Tech., 27, 327. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4957176.
Shelton, D. (Ed.). (2007). Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270989.001.0001.
Tropina, T. (2024). ‘This is not a human rights convention!’: The perils of overlooking human rights in the UN cybercrime treaty. Journal of Cyber Policy, 9(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2024.2419517.
UN International Labour Organization. (1999). Convention concerning the Prohibition and Immediate Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour (No. 182), 2133 U.N.T.S. 161. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C182.
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2022). Legislating for the digital age: Global guide on improving legislative frameworks to protect children from online sexual exploitation and abuse. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/media/120386/file/Legislating%20for%20the%20digital%20age_Global%20Guide.pdf.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2019). Guidelines regarding the implementation of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (CRC/C/156). Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (Global CSAM Legislative Overview, 2024).
United Nations General Assembly. (2019). General Assembly Resolution 74/174: Countering Child Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse Online (A/RES/74/174). https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/74/174.
United Nations General Assembly. (2022). General Assembly Resolution 77/233 of 15 December 2022: Strengthening national and international efforts, including with the private sector, to protect children from sexual exploitation and abuse (A/RES/77/233). https://docs.un.org/en/a/res/77/233.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.
United Nations. (2000). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, 2171 U.N.T.S. 222. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc-sale.pdf.
United Nations. (2024). United Nations Convention against Cybercrime; Strengthening International Cooperation for Combating Certain Crimes Committed by Means of Information and Communications Technology Systems and for the Sharing of Evidence in Electronic Form of Serious Crimes (A/RES/79/243). https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/cybercrime/convention/text/convention-full-text.html.
World Congress III against Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents. (2008). The Rio de Janeiro Declaration and Call for Action to Prevent and Stop Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human/child/congress0811-d.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
