Russian Professor as a Laborer in the Era of Ratings, Digitalization and the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.02.02Keywords:
labor law, education, higher learning, collective labor contract, individual labor contract, effective contract, (private law) service agreement, rankings systems, ratings systems, the Covid-19 pandemicAbstract
The traditional labor contract has actually ceased to be the principal legal document, regulating labor relations of Russian university teachers. The individual labor contract was reduced to the status of a mere ‘rudimentary’ annex to the so-called effective contract. The latter is legally non-existent and is not even mentioned in the Labor Code of Russia of 2001. The Covid-19 pandemic with its isolationist features aggravated the absurd paradigm change within the Russian Labor law. As a result, the illegitimate effective contract has virtually supplanted the regular labor contract. There may be traced three dominant features of the new labor regime, induced by the Covid-19 pandemic. Firstly, the said labor regime fosters social dissociation of former (ante-pandemic) colleagues with the inevitable harm to the social nature and human dignity of homo faber. Secondly, we can witness the strengthening of the external - via internet - exploitation of university teachers by a corresponding managerial staff and the merging of this exploitation with the academic staff’s self-exploitation. Thirdly, the said regime is responsible for virtual disappearance of difference between working days of university teachers and leisure hours, previously reserved for reading and research.
Downloads
References
Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Decree concerning the abolishment of estates and civil ranks from November 12, 1917.
Graeber, D. (2018). Bullshit Jobs: a Theory. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster.
Hagen, W. (Hg.) (2009). Was tun Herr Luhmann? Vorletzte Gespräche mit Niklas Luhmann. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.
Lauer, G. (Hg.) (2017). Wilhelm von Humboldt: Schriften zur Bildung. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Luhmann, N. (1999). Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts. Frankfurt a/M.: Suhrkamp.
McNeill, D. (2021). Fetishism and the Theory of Value. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Münch, R. (2007, October). Akademischer Kapitalismus. Zeit Online. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/2007/40/Akademischer-Kapitalismus.
Ollman, B. (1977). Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in a Capitalist Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ordinance of the Government of the Russian Federation Nr. 2190-p from November 26, 2012.
Ordinance of the Government of the Russian Federation Nr. 722-p from April 30, 2014.
Polanyi, K. (1977). The Livelihood of Man. N.Y. etc.: Academic Press.
Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1944).
Ryazantseva, M.V., & Subocheva, A.O. (2014). Problemy vnedreniya “effektivnogo kontrakta” v gosudarstevennoi grazhdanskoi sluzhbe Rossiyskoi Federatsii. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii, 10(2). Retrieved from https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/10/39825.
The Code of Labor Laws from October 12, 1918.
The Code of Labor Laws of Russian Federation from December 9, 1971.
The Labor Code of Russia from December 30, 2001.
Veblen, T. (1918). The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Univesities by Business Men. N.Y.: Hill & Wang.
Vorobyova E.S. (2014). Effektivnyi kontrakt kak sposob povysheniya rezultativnosti deyatelnosti gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh. Moskva: Yustitsinform.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sergey Korolev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
