On the Unity of Nature in the Context of Bialowieza Forest - A Philosophical Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2018.02.01.03Keywords:
pantheism, unity of nature, ecophilosophy, Arne Naess, Bialowieza ForestAbstract
The objective of the paper is to present philosophical positions arguing the unity of nature: from the pantheistic doctrine of the Stoics and the version of pantheism proposed by G. Bruno and B. Spinoza, through the Leibniz concept which assumes that every element of nature is spiritual and capable of intentional actions, to contemporary doctrines. One of the concepts – the “deep ecology” of A. Naess, emphasizes the need for the subjective treatment of every element of nature – people, animals and plants; it postulates the specific equality of all species. The assumptions of eco-philosophy are perfectly in line with the findings of contemporary nature researchers proving that the bonds between individual elements of a given ecosystem are deeper than previously assumed, forming a complex multi-level network. A violation of the precisely developed balance can have far-reaching negative effects including for humankind. Modern philosophers stress that people responsible for shaping ecological policy should aim at protecting entire ecosystems, and they should ensure the maintenance of its balance. This philosophical message can be dedicated especially to the politicians responsible for the decision on the unprecedented logging of the Bialowieza Forest.
Downloads
References
Albińska, E. (2005). Człowiek w środowisku przyrodniczym i społecznym. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Copleston, F. (1958). History of Philosophy, v. IV, Descartes to Leibniz. London: Search Press, New Jersey: Paulist Press.
Czerwiński, G. (2005). Przyroda dzika – przyroda romantyczna. Czy można potraktować romantyków jako dziewiętnastowiecznych rzeczników filozofii ekologicznej? Dzikie Życie, 132(6).
Gut, P. (2004). Leibniz. Myśl filozoficzna w XVII wieku. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Jarzębiak, J., (2010). Zarys teologii stoickiej, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica 23, 173-192.
Justyńska, I., Justyński, J. (2013). Historia myśli socjologiczno-ekonomicznej. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Kiełczewski, D. (2001). Ekologia społeczna. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i Środowisko.
Konstytucja Szwajcarii, tytuł III, displayed at: http://libr.sejm.gov.pl/tek01/txt/konst/szwajcaria.html
Korbel, A. J. (2001). O przyrodzie i człowieku. Pracownia na rzecz Wszystkich Istot.
Korzeniowska, K., Pawłowska, D., Kopeć, J., Makarenko V., Mierzejewski, M., Ochota, R., Uhlig, D., Wajrak, A., Wyrok na puszczę, displayed at: https://infografiki.wyborcza.pl/wyrok-na puszcze/desktop.html?utm_source=SARE&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=puszcza
Magee, B. (2016). The Story of Philosophy. Dorling Kindersley Publishing.
Matczak, P. (2000). Problemy ekologiczne jako problemy społeczne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Naess, A., Haukeland, P. I., (2008). Life’s Philosophy: Reason and Feeling in a Deeper World. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press.
Naess, A. (1993). Spinoza and the deep ecology movement. Eburon Academic Publishers. Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals. New York: Review/Random House.
Old Testament, Standard English Version, displayed at: http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-28.htm
Skolimowski, H. (1993). Filozofia żyjąca. Eko-filozofia jako drzewo życia. Warszawa: Pusty Obłok.
Skolimowski, H. (1992). Nadzieja matką mądrych. Eseje o ekologii. Warszawa: Akapit Press.
Skolimowski, H. (1991). Ocalić Ziemię - Świt filozofii ekologicznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo K. Staszewskiego.
Święczkowska, H. (1998). Harmonia Linguarum. Język i jego funkcje w filozofii Leibniza. Białystok: Wydawnictwo UwB.
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1995). Historia filozofii, t. 2. Warszawa: PWN.
Ustawa z dnia 21 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie zwierząt (tekst jedn. Dz. U. z 2017 r., poz. 1840, ze zm.). displayed at: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19971110724/U/D19970724Lj.pdf
Witoszek, N., Brennan, A. (Eds.). (1999). Philosophical Dialogues: Arne Næss and the Progress of Ecophilosophy. New York, Oxford: Rowmann and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Lanham, Boulder.
Wohlleben, P. (2017). Duchowe życie zwierząt. Kraków: Otwarte.
Wohlleben, P. (2017). Nieznane więzi natury. Kraków: Otwarte.
Wohlleben, P. (2016). Sekretne życie drzew. Kraków: Otwarte.
De Waal, F. (2016). Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
De Waal, F. (2014). Evolved Morality. The Biology and Philosophy of Human Conscience. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
De Waal, F. (2013). The Bonobo and the Atheist. In Search of Humanism Among the Primates. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Waloszczyk, K. (1996). Kryzys ekologiczny w świetle ekofilozofii. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Katarzyna Doliwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
