The Case of "Białowieska" as a Universal Example of Cooperation Between Jews, Poles and Russians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2018.02.01.01Keywords:
Jews in Białowieska, Poles in Białowieska, Russians in Białowieska, cooperation between the Jewish, Polish and Russian nations, Białowieska Universal Case, Hassidic movement in Poland, Chabad Lubavich in PolandAbstract
Article analyses the phenomena of ”Białowieska” forest as a starting point for cooperation between the Jewish, Polish and Russian nations. The research is based on historical, theoretical background as well as from the over national point of view. Analysed extraordinary status of “Białowieska” through the ages is not only universal but timeless. The research proves that multinational cooperation between nations can be achieved with respect for each other’s values and with positive mutually effective results.
Downloads
References
Chlebowski, B. (Ed.). (1895). Słownik geograficzny Królestwa Polskiego i innych krajów słowiańskich. Vol. XIV. Warszawa: Druk „WIEKU” Nowy-Świat Nr. 61.
Gutowski, J. (2000). Zasady funkcjonowania Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego powiększonego na cały obszar polskiej części Puszczy Białowieskiej. Białowieża: Białowieski Park Narodowy.
Iwaniuk, H. (1996). Turystyka jako element ekorozwoju Rejonu Puszczy Białowieskiej. In: B. Poskrobko (Ed.), Rejon Puszczy Białowieskiej. Mieszkańcy – Środowisko – Gospodarka. Studia i Materiały Nr 1 (pp. 143–167). Białystok: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Białostockiej.
Karcov, G. (2015). Puszcza Białowieska. Zarys historii, współczesne gospodarstwo łowiecki i polowania Panujących w Puszczy, St.Petersburg: Publikator. (Original work published 1903).
Kozieł, M. (2010). Ochrona walorów przyrodniczo-krajobrazowych na pograniczu polsko-białoruskim na przykładzie Puszczy Białowieskiej. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, XXVI, 271-285.
Kwiatkowski, W. & Stepaniuk, M. (2008). Geologiczne i hydrogeologiczne uwarunkowania rozmieszczenia roślinności w Puszczy Białowieskiej. In E. Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk & M. Stepaniuk (Eds.), Rozwój obszarów przyrodniczo cennych (pp. 17-35). Białystok: PTG.
Lockwood, K. (2014). Political Power, a Religious Agenda and the Failings of the Endorsement Test: Hasidic Educational Separatism and the East Ramapo School Boards. First Amendment Law Review, 12(3), 698-720.
Montesquieu. (1748). The Spirit of Laws (T. Nugent, Trans.), bk. 20, CHS. 1-8. Retrieved from http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch4s2.html
Moroz-Keczynska, E. & Keczyński, A. (2008). Zasoby przyrodnicze i kulturowe Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego. In E. Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk & M. Stepaniuk (Eds.), Rozwój obszarów przyrodniczo cennych (pp. 8-18). Białystok: PTG.
Pawleta, E. (2009). Białostocki ewenement- Szlak dziedzictwa żydowskiego. Białystok: Historical Museum in Bialystok.
Perkowski, M., Hryniewiecka-Filipkowska, W. & Dąbrowska, I. (2018). Protection of the Bialowieża Forest as a Challenge to Cross Border Cooperation. International Community Law Review, 20(1), 71-107.
Polonsky, A. (2014). Dzieje Żydów w Polsce i Rosji. Warszawa: PWN.
Saiman, Ch. (2005-2006). Legal Theology: The Turn to Conceptualism in Nineteenth Century Jewish Law. Journal of Law and Religion, 21(1), 40-66.
Samojlik, T. (2005). Ochrona i Łowy. Puszcza Białowieska w czasach królewskich. Białowieża: Zakład Badania Ssaków PAN.
Sosna, G. & Troc-Sosna, A. (2012). Hierarchia i kler kościoła prawosławnego w granicach II Rzeczypospolitej i Polski powojennej w XIX–XXI wieku. Białystok-Ryboły: Orthdruk.
Więcko, E. (1984). Puszcza Białowieska. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Wishniakov, E. (1894). Biełowieżskaja Puszcza. St. Petersburg, as cited by P. Bajko. (2001). Białowieża zarys dziejów, Białowieża: Orthdruk.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Wojciech Konaszczuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Author declares that he or she has created the written work and holds exclusive and unlimited copyright /both moral and property rights/ and guarantees that no third parties have rights to the work.
2. In the view of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, a work must fulfill the following criterion:
a) be a manifestation of creative work,
b) have an individual character („author’s personal stamp”),
c) have a set form.
3. The Author declares that the text has not been previously published (under the same or different title, or as a part of another publication).
4. The Author allows (grants a non-exclusive license) the publishing house of University of Białystok to use the scholarly text to:
- preserve and multiply by means of any technique; save in a digital form with no limitations as to the manner and form of digital preservation;
- upload online with no limitations as to the place and time of access.
5. The Author grants consent for editorial changes made in the work.
6. The Author grants the University of Białystok rights free of charge for the duration of property copyright with no territory limits. The University has the right to grant sublicenses in the acquired rights.
7. Granting a non-exclusive license allows the Author to preserve their rights and allows other parties to make use of the work according to sublicensing agreement with provisions identical as those of Attribution 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY 4.0), available online at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. License to all its content published from 2023 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 to all its content published from 2017 to 2022.
8. The Agreement has been concluded for an indefinite period of time.
9. Because of costs born in preparation of the work for publishing, the Parties oblige themselves to act in good faith and refrain from declining to grant licenses.
10. To all matters not settled herein, provisions of the Civil Code and Copyright and Related Rights Act of 1994, February 4 shall apply.
11. All disputes shall be resolved by a court of local jurisdiction for the place of seat of University of Białystok.
