Considerations on Limits to Dynamic / Evolutive Interpretation of Constituent Instruments of International Organizations (with the Particular Reference to the UN System)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.01.01Keywords:
dynamic interpretation, evolutive interpretation, international organizations, international law, UN SystemAbstract
International organizations, for the purpose of further considerations are these established by multilateral treaties constituting their internal legal order and establishing legal personality for them, which is independent and separate from their member states. The emphasis in this article is on the UN and its Specialized Agencies. Since in practice their constituent instruments are interpreted on the daily basis in the continuous process of performing their functions and filling the gaps, some of extensive interpretations may lead to informal modifications of the constitutional instruments. To examine whether there are any limits to the dynamic / evolutive (extensive) interpretations is of grave significance both for international law doctrine and practice, as well as political reality. In conclusion: the Report and the IDI Resolution adopted on 4th September, 2021, are the good ground for better understanding of recent developments in the daily lives of the UN System.
References
Bernhardt, R. (1995). Interpretation in International Law. In: R. Bernhardt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. II. Amsterdam-Lausanne-New York-Oxford-Shannon-Tokyo: Elsevier.
Ehrlich, L. (1957). Interpretacja traktatów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.
Ehrlich, L. (1928). L’interprétation des traités. RCADI, 24(4), 12-32.
Hudson, M.O. (Ed.) (1934). World Court Reports, vol I (1922-1926). Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Lankosz, K. (1985). Interpretacja statutów organizacji międzynarodowych. Kraków: Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie – Seria Specjalna „Monografie”.
Lankosz, K. (Ed.) (2014). Wielka encyklopedia prawa, Tom IV – Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Warszawa: Fundacja Ubi Societas, Ibi Ius.
Kocot, K. (1971). Organizacje międzynarodowe. Systematyczny zarys zagadnień prawa międzynarodowego. Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków-Gdańsk: Ossolineum.
Kuźniak, B., Marcinko, M. & Ingelevič-Citak, M. (2017). Organizacje międzynarodowe. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck.
Nahlik, S.E. (1976). Kodeks prawa traktatów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PWN.
Shermers, H.G. (1972). International Institutional Law, vol. II. Leiden: Brill.
de Vattel, E. (1758). Le droit des gen sou principes de la lci naturelle, vol 2, Londres.
Opinions and other documents:
Alvarez A., Recueil CIJ, 1950 concerning the admission of new members to the United Nations.
Alvarez A., Recueil CIJ, 1951 concerning reservations to the Convention on genocide.
The report of the Institute of International Law: Are there Limits to the Dynamic Interpretation of the Constitution and Statutes of International Organizations by the Internal Organs of such Organizations (with Particular Reference to the UN System)? / Y a-t-il des limites à l’interprétation dynamique de la Constitution ou du statut des organisations internationales par les organes de celles-ci, avec une référence particulière au système des Nations Unies?, „IDI Annuaire” 2021.
The resolution of the Institute of International Law of 4 September 2021: Limits to Evolutive Interpretation of the Constituent Instruments of the Organizations within the United Nations System by their Internal Organs / Limites à l’interprétation évolutive des actes constitutifs des organisations du système des Nations Unies par leurs organes internes.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrigts & Open Access Policy
1. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivs 4.0 Internacional License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided acknowledgment of the authorship, the url, and the journal, and not used for commercial purposes. For license details please see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
2. The journal conserves the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the works published, and encourages and allows the reuse of the same under the license specified in point 1.
3. The journal allows authors to spread electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) the published version of his works, as it encourages its circulation and diffusion earliest and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community.
4. The author(s) has read and accepts the terms contained in the Author Statement.